Max Stirner is trash and all the people who like him are fad chasers or left wing academics with their heads shoved so far up their own ass they can sniff their intestines. Don't bring 4chud or leftypol /lit/ garbage here.

>>356
"4chud" and "leftypol" /lit/ is allowed here and only here, because it's still literature. Please don't become rabid. Read the fucking sticky. If you don't agree with it, don't reply with such nonsense.

"Anything relating to the topic of literature can be discussed here; from fiction, to politics, and philosophy—so long as it's civil."

Stirner's whole philosophy rides on his vague account of the individual which is descriptively false. Once you see through that the rest of it falls apart pretty quickly. What Stirner takes to be an absolute fact, the existence of the bounded individual, is a construction of Western modernity and a concept both external and prior to any one person making it a spook (fixed idea) by Stirner's own standards. Stirner's philosophy is nonsensical and incoherent.